Hard asset dividend spreads vs US Treasuries (September 2026): Tanker operators yield 8-12% (+500-900 bps over 10Y), coal miners like Thungela at ~15% (+1,100+ bps), midstream pipelines compressing to 5-7% (+100-300 bps). The spread hasn't disappeared but is narrowing fastest at the bottom end. Shipping and select miners still offer fair risk compensation — generic energy infrastructure is getting expensive relative to its profile. Not investment advice.
The 10-year Treasury yield is compressing — but hard asset dividend spreads are narrowing too.
The question isn't "dividends or Treasuries." It's which segment of the hard asset universe is still offering fair compensation for the specific risks you're taking. Right now, that points toward shipping and select miners over generic energy infrastructure. Here's the math behind that call.
Blog › Hard Asset Income Analysis
As of early September 2026, the math looks like this for representative positions across the hard asset income universe:
| VLCC Tanker Operators | 8-12% yield · +500-900 bps spread |
| Coal Mining (Thungela) | ~15% yield · +1,100-1,500 bps spread |
| Upstream Energy (APA, Petrobras) | 6-9% yield · +200-500 bps spread |
| Midstream Pipelines | 5-7% yield · +100-300 bps spread |
| Shipping REITs | 6-8% yield · +200-400 bps spread |
The spread hasn't disappeared — but it's compressing at the bottom end. Midstream pipelines that used to offer a clean 300+ bps premium over Treasuries are now hovering closer to 150-200 bps in many cases. That's not enough compensation for the concentration risk of holding one company's contract book.
Disclosure: I hold positions in several of the companies mentioned above — CMB.Tech, Dorian LPG, Thungela Resources, TORM, FLEX LNG, International Seaways, Petrobras, APA Corp., BP, Frontline — in my publicly accessible Trade Republic and Scalable Capital portfolios. No investment advice.
The tanker segment — crude and product — continues to offer the most compelling yield-to-risk ratio among hard asset income plays. Three structural factors drive this:
1. Fleet age is a tailwind, not a headwind. The average VLCC is now over 16 years old. When scrapping accelerates (and it tends to do so in tandem with environmental regulation tightening), supply growth becomes negative even as demand holds steady. You're buying cash flows from vessels that will be decommissioned within a decade — which means the earnings window is defined, not infinite.
2. Geographic rerouting adds structural miles. Red Sea disruptions, sanctions-driven routing changes around Russia and Iran, and the simple fact that OPEC+ production cuts don't eliminate the need to move existing inventories — all of this means tonne-miles are structurally higher than pre-2024 levels. Higher miles equals more vessel days demanded, which equals rate support.
3. The orderbook is historically thin. Newbuilding orders as a percentage of existing fleet sit below 10% for crude tankers. Compare that to the 30-40% levels seen before every supply glut in the past two decades. When the cycle turns up, there's nothing sitting in dry dock waiting to flood the market.
Coal mining stocks like Thungela Resources are trading at single-digit P/E multiples while paying double-digit dividend yields. On paper, that's the kind of number that makes value investors sit up. In practice, it raises two questions:
Is the yield sustainable? Thungela exceeded production guidance in what was supposed to be its worst year — 13.9 Mt actual versus 12.8-13.6 Mt guidance — and remains debt-free. A balance sheet with no leverage gives management room to maintain distributions even if coal prices soften moderately.
Is the multiple a value trap or genuine discount? The market is pricing in an energy transition that eliminates thermal coal demand linearly. Reality is messier: emerging market demand (India, Southeast Asia) is holding steady, and the marginal cost curve for new renewable capacity in those regions means coal remains the cheapest baseload option for at least another 5-7 years in many markets.
The 1,100+ bps spread over Treasuries isn't free — it's compensation for commodity price risk, regulatory uncertainty, and the genuine question of how fast emerging markets can transition away from thermal coal. If you believe the transition is slower than consensus expects, that spread looks generous. If you think acceleration is coming, it looks like a value trap with a pretty coupon.
Three catalysts could reshape these spreads before year-end:
Fed rate trajectory. Another 25-50 bps of cuts would compress Treasury yields and mechanically widen dividend spreads — making income assets more attractive by comparison. A pause or hawkish surprise does the opposite.
Shipping earnings season. Q3 results from major tanker operators (Frontline, TORM, Dorian LPG, FLEX LNG) will show whether rate levels are translating into bottom-line cash flow at the pace the market expects.
OPEC+ September decision. Any production increase beyond current levels would put downward pressure on crude prices and, by extension, on tanker utilization rates — though rerouting effects may partially offset volume declines.
The risk premium for holding hard asset dividend stocks over US Treasuries is still there — but it's no longer uniform across the sector. Tankers and coal miners offer wide spreads with real structural justification. Midstream pipelines are getting expensive relative to their risk profile. And everything sits under the shadow of whatever the Fed does next.
If you're building an income portfolio around hard assets, the question isn't "dividends or Treasuries" — it's which segment is still offering fair compensation for the specific risks you're taking. Right now, that points toward shipping and select miners over generic energy infrastructure.
Use a portfolio tracker that shows real-time yield and cost basis across brokers. I use Parqet for my public portfolios.
Try Parqet Free — Portfolio TrackerMore analysis on the MB Capital Strategies YouTube channel.
Disclaimer: This article does not constitute investment advice. All information is for personal education and entertainment only. Marco Bozem holds positions in CMB.Tech, Dorian LPG, Thungela Resources, TORM, FLEX LNG, International Seaways, Petrobras, APA Corp., BP, Frontline and others in his publicly accessible Trade Republic and Scalable Capital portfolios (tracked via Parqet). CapTrader holdings are not disclosed. Every investment carries the risk of partial or total loss. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Act on your own judgment and consult a qualified financial advisor if needed.
My Toolbox & Resources
Disclosure: Some links are affiliate links. This helps support our free content at no extra cost to you.
